<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lansing, MI Mortgage &#187; home equity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lansingmimortgage.com/tag/home-equity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lansingmimortgage.com</link>
	<description>Lansing, MI Mortgage - Get The Advice You Deserve - Cornerstone Home Loans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:14:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Bother Refinancing &#8211; I</title>
		<link>http://www.lansingmimortgage.com/why-bother-refinancing-i.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lansingmimortgage.com/why-bother-refinancing-i.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evan Vanderwey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lansing Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Why Bother Refinancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraised value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closing costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refinance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lansingmimortgage.com/?p=671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Appraised value may not be enough – should I take the risk?

I made this one first because this conversation is at least a part of nine out of ten discussions with clients who are evaluating a refinance. 

Mr. Client (Joe) called in and said that he owed 150,000 on his mortgage.  We ran the numbers and a refinance would definitely be very beneficial.  He had an interest rate of 6.75% right now...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appraised value may not be enough – should I take the risk?</p>
<p>I made this one first because this conversation is at least a part of nine out of ten discussions with clients who are evaluating a refinance.</p>
<p>Mr. Client (Joe) called in and said that he owed 150,000 on his mortgage.  We ran the numbers, and a refinance would definitely be very beneficial.  He has an interest rate of 6.75% right now.  Even though he makes payments to a local bank, Fannie Mae is the lender who funded his loan – that means he could refinance even if his home is worth far less than his mortgage balance.  How much less?  If his home appraised for $125,000, he could still participate without bringing a lot of money to closing.</p>
<p>A refinance could put him in a 20-year mortgage for just a few dollars more than the payment he makes on his current loan which still has 27 years left.  His principle and interest payment is right around $1000.  That means his savings would be $84000.  Seven years of payments – 84 months X’s $1000 per month.  This would make a lot of sense.</p>
<p>But he&#8217;s concerned about his home’s value.  He purchased it three years ago at the top of the market and put very little down.  He knows of two homes that are about the size of his on his street that recently sold for over $100,000 – but not much over.  Both of those sales were bank-owned properties, and the three homes that are currently listed for sale on his street are listed at around $115,000.  He has called a Realtor and paid her to see if any homes have sold in the last 3 or 4 months that were not bank-owned and may have gone for more money.  Nothing turned up.  This is a rather large neighborhood that is bordered by main streets on almost all sides.  We think his value would come in right around $110,000 based on the information we have.</p>
<p>In this case I had to tell the client that he should not bother paying for an appraisal – his home would not likely appraise for enough money to make this worth his while.</p>
<p>Now having said that, we did discuss the possibility of his coming to the closing table with some money.  Because his mortgage is owned by Fannie Mae, he is eligible for a mortgage of 125% of what ever the value is.  That number would be $137,500.</p>
<p>If Joe had $12,500 in his account and the ability to cover about $2500 in closing costs on top of that, then he might be able to get this done.  He would have to move some money from his cash reserves into the equity of his home.  If he has a cash reserve – and taking this money would still leave him with a minimum of three months of his expenses – then I would recommend he do it.  In fact, if he did that, then he could potentially squeeze into a 15-year fixed mortgage – his payment would be just a few dollars over $1100.  Then is total savings over 15 years would be around $130,000!</p>
<p>Now that would be quite a return on $12,500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lansingmimortgage.com/why-bother-refinancing-i.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for Pollyanna! Seeing things on the Bright Side this Spring</title>
		<link>http://www.lansingmimortgage.com/looking-for-pollyanna-seeing-things-on-the-bright-side-this-spring.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lansingmimortgage.com/looking-for-pollyanna-seeing-things-on-the-bright-side-this-spring.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evan Vanderwey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lansing Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank owned homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage rates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lansingmimortgage.com/?p=521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How’s that for depressing!

I have done calculations like this one with my excel spreadsheet 100s of times. Having the information can be helpful, but writing an article with this as the only conclusion is misleading. There are at least three reasons why this article should not have hit the web the way that it did...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following few paragraphs are excerpts from the article:</p>
<p>January 29, 2010<br />
<a href="http://www.nationalmortgagenews.com/lead_story/?story_id=179">Home Equity Won&#8217;t Be Coming Back for a Very Long Time</a><br />
By Lew Sichelman</p>
<p>Google him for the entire article, but a synopsis of it is here:</p>
<p>“There&#8217;s no magic online calculator that can accurately tell when the<br />
value of homes will once again equate to what was paid for them, or to<br />
what they were worth before housing prices fell off the cliff.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s going to be a long time coming,&#8221; says HSH vice president Keith<br />
Gumbinger of the prospects of rebuilding &#8220;lost&#8221; equity.</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s impossible to accurately predict anything about the<br />
current state of housing.</p>
<p>Going forward is pretty much a toss-up, but HSH is proscribing a flat<br />
real estate market with no increase in value through June. Then, from<br />
July through August 2011, a period of 14 months, prices are projected to<br />
increase at a rate of about 2.5% a year. And from then on out, the<br />
company is figuring on a yearly gain of 3%.</p>
<p>With these percentages in mind, let&#8217;s look at what happens to the value<br />
of a $200,000 house purchased at the top of the market in July 2006:</p>
<p>By the time the market hits bottom &#8211; at least the bottom, according to<br />
Case-Shiller &#8211; that property was worth a paltry $134,800, a decline of<br />
32.6%. Using HSH&#8217;s assumptions, the value of our imaginary house won&#8217;t<br />
get back to the $200,000 the fictitious buyer originally forked over for<br />
it until July 2022.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right. It will be 12.5 more years until this house is once again<br />
worth what was originally paid for it.”</p>
<p>How’s that for depressing!</p>
<p>I have done calculations like this one with my excel spreadsheet 100s of times.  Having the information can be helpful, but writing an article with this as the only conclusion is misleading.  There are at least three reasons why this article should not have hit the web the way that it did.</p>
<p>First, this analysis is riddled with predictions about the future.  He even says three or four times that there is no way to know what will happen, but then begins to make huge assumptions – this is speculation at best.</p>
<p>Second, he is using a national index and drawing conclusions that people in Grand Ledge, MI will apply to themselves.  There is no normal, no one is actually average.</p>
<p>Third, his analysis is myopic.  It only looks at the &#8220;problem&#8221; and sees nothing else.</p>
<p>For example: If this whole housing collapse did not happen, then neither would have the following (non-exhaustive) list of opportunities:</p>
<p>1.  Mortgage rates on a 15 year fixed rate loan in the low 4s &#8211; allowing this same homeowner who follows sound advice to make a payment similar to what they were previously paying and eliminate their loan 10 or so years sooner.  So even though that particular home may not reach the price the homeowner paid for it for more than a decade – it WILL likely have the same amount of equity in it.  Your balance sheet can improve even with declining assets when you deleverage.</p>
<p>2.  A stock market that is currently offering equities at a price that gives the same number of shares of the same great companies but for 1998 prices.  Even $100 per month invested in the average 401k of the average American is a huge gain over the same 12.5 years that would not have otherwise been present.</p>
<p>3.  Bank owned homes are being offered for sale at prices 50% of their previously offered price and sometimes even better than this.  Two or three families getting together to make an investment can purchase a nice investment property, fix it up, and rent it out to a less fortunate family for about $45,000 &#8216;all in&#8217; in many communities around the country.  Later, they may sell this home to the tenants securing a fair profit for themselves and a warm home for a family in need.  Families on both sides of the transaction benefited from the low price.</p>
<p>4.  Inflation right now is almost flat.  The price of most living expenses is not rising.  We are not losing buying power on our current cash.  In fact the bond market has factored in an inflation rate of only 2.7% for the next 10 years.</p>
<p>These are just a few of many opportunities or positives that did not exist three years ago and would not have existed if it weren’t for the “crash” of the housing bubble.</p>
<p>A few cliche&#8217;s</p>
<p>~Today, a dollar saved is truly a dollar earned.<br />
~Money is relative.<br />
~When God closes a door, He opens a window.</p>
<p>In other words:</p>
<p>When something really negative happens, look around you for opportunity; its likely everywhere.  If you include in that motto &#8211; helping others (like in #3 above) &#8211; you will do well by doing good.</p>
<p>This has always been true but never like it is at times like this.</p>
<p>Someone ought to tell the guy who wrote that article to hang out with Polyanna for a while and go look on the bright side!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lansingmimortgage.com/looking-for-pollyanna-seeing-things-on-the-bright-side-this-spring.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
